Determining clinical significance independently from statistical significance? Implications for practice
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background In science, statistics are universally used for making an inference about a population from sample data. The purpose of statistical inference is to determine if a proposed null hypothesis can be rejected, by comparing the probability of an observation to occur under the null hypothesis (p-value) to a chosen alpha level of confidence. The null hypothesis is rejected if the p-value is smaller than alpha. The current focus on null hypothesis statistical significance testing in published work perpetuates confusion between statistical significance and clinical importance. Clinically, there are shortfalls to relying only on statistical inference.
منابع مشابه
The importance of determining the clinical significance of research results in physical therapy clinical research.
Clinical research in physical therapy is fundamental to generate new knowledge and validate our therapies. The evaluation of research findings is crucial to help clinical decision making and to comply with the principles of evidence based-practice. Statistical significance testing has dominated the way researchers typically report their results and evaluate their significance. This approach has...
متن کاملWhen does pain matter? Acknowledging the subjectivity of clinical significance.
The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as ‘‘an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage,’’ acknowledging that ‘‘pain is always subjective’’ [20]. This definition, based on individual differences in pain perception, is the cornerstone of pain research and practice and is co...
متن کاملBeyond the Limits: Clinical Utility of Novel Cardiac Biomarkers
Preoperative assessment of cardiovascular risk is essential when it comes to extensive noncardiac surgery procedures. Therefore, accurate and timely diagnosis of myocyte damage is vital. In modern medical practice it is believed that the so-called "multimarker" approach is the most appropriate and most accurate, but new research points out that there are novel biomarkers which could be used ind...
متن کاملJADA Azarpazhooh Carrasco - Labra , Prakeshkumar Shah
I nvestigators in a study published in 2010 compared the efficacy of nimesulide with that of meloxicam (two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) in the control of postoperative pain, swelling and trismus after extraction of impacted man-dibular third molars. 1 Among their conclusions , the authors stated that " [nimesu-lide] was more effective than [meloxicam] in the control of swelling and tr...
متن کاملروش معناداری بالینی تغییرات درمانی: ویژگیها، شیوه محاسبه، تصمیمگیری و محدودیتها
Statistical significant methods are usually used to evaluate the effectiveness of the psychological treatments however, these methods have a number of inherent limitations. In fact, significant differences between the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores of patients per se do not necessarily indicate that the patients have reached the level of successful performance in their real life. Thus,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012